wiki:SL_PDR_July2020

2020-07-19 Notes

GENERAL:

Following ATLAS guidelines for firmware development?

  • Is the firmware in a repository? All TDAQ developers are supposed to have access.
  • Are they using HOG?
  • Do they have a coding style document

TGC

  • URAM are 4096x72 (288k). in VU90 there are 960.
  • BRAM are 512x72 (or 1024x72). in VU90 2048 (1024)
  • Trigger path
    • TGC-BW wire reconstruction
      • 92 "units" per SL
      • 4x URAM per Unit = 368 URAM
    • TGC-BW strip segment reconstruction
      • 88 "units" per SL
      • 1x URAM per 2 units = 44 URAM
    • Strips+wires combined using BRAMS (not yet developed)
    • TGC+NSW combined using BRAMs (not yet developed)
    • TGC-EI/RPC/Tilecal combined using BRAMS
  • DAQ path
    • 4 BX per L0A
    • 6700 ch bitmap convert to hits (40 hits/BX for PU=200)
    • convert in parallel
    • prototype for 32 channels implemented
  • Missing
    • All interfaces
    • TTC
    • Control/monitoring

No power estimates. Resource estimates sketchy.

RPC

Algorithms described fairly well but no power or resource estimates.

Review 7/22

  • "Design ready"? If so, where is it? Can we look at the design files?
  • Over-temp, over-current shutdown on blade?
  • Sensor access by SoC
  • Power-up and power-down (SoC startup and shutdown)
  • Can recover from SoC boot failure?
  • HW slide 10 - where are chip-to-chip transceivers?
  • Slide 11 - only one reference clock freq?
  • Power control - can SoC shut down blade
  • How to set MAC / IP address?
  • Take care of level shifting and power zones in I2C network
Last modified 4 years ago Last modified on Jul 22, 2020, 9:11:10 AM